KJ ReportsKJ Reports

Churchill – A Lifelong Zionist

7 July 20171,165

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

Churchill – A Lifelong Zionist

Britain saw the Jewish national home as creating a reliable client population in a strategically important region.

It helped keep the French, the controllers of neighbouring Syria, out of a territory bordering the Suez Canal area and close to the Arabian Peninsula.

British rule in Palestine lasted for thirty years until the military withdrawal in 1948.

It was continually confronted with the competing claims of the majority Arab population,

which feared displacement by increasing Jewish immigration, and the Jewish population, whose Zionist vision was the consolidation of a homeland as promised by the British.

Overall, however, British strategy in Palestine clearly favoured the Jewish population throughout the 1920s and 1930s in its sponsorship of immigration into Palestine.

This changed the demographic balance in Palestine from 600,000 Arabs and 80,000 Jews in 1917 to one million Arabs and 400,000 Jews by 1938.

The basic policy was set by the 1922 White Paper, drawn up by Colonial Secretary Winston Churchill, whose concern was to ensure that no Arab majority could stand in the way of Jewish immigration.

Churchill – a lifelong Zionist  – regularly spoke against the possibility of the Arabs in Palestine achieving self-determination and representative government.

He regarded Arabs as ‘a lower manifestation’ than the Jews, who, he contended, accomplished much more economically in Palestine and were ‘a higher grade race’ compared to the ‘great hordes of Islam’ who were unable to cultivate the land.

Tom Segev, author of One Palestine Complete, claims that Churchill once told his close friend and an elder of the Zionist movement, Chaim Weizmann, that he would support the Zionists “even if they did horribly stupid things”.

Reference

Mark Curtis (British Secret Affairs)

#churchill#churchill-colonialism#churchill-history#churchill-israel#churchill-palestine#churchill-zionism#winston-churchill

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Houthi Attrition: Why Riyadh Cannot Buy Maritime Security
Middle East

The Houthi Attrition: Why Riyadh Cannot Buy Maritime Security

Saudi Arabia’s multibillion-dollar military modernisation has failed to break the Houthi maritime siege. The crisis reveals a fundamental misalignment between traditional state power and the low-cost economics of asymmetric Red Sea disruption.

29 Sept 2026

The Persian Siege: How Iran Rewrote the Global Inflation Equation
Middle East

The Persian Siege: How Iran Rewrote the Global Inflation Equation

Tehran has transitioned from conventional deterrence to a permanent strategy of maritime friction. By weaponising chokepoints, Iran is no longer just seeking regional hegemony; it is exporting structural inflation to the West as a geopolitical tool.

27 Sept 2026

Silicon Siege: How the Strait of Hormuz Broke the Tech Supply Chain
Middle East

Silicon Siege: How the Strait of Hormuz Broke the Tech Supply Chain

As the conflict between Washington and Tehran intensifies, the disruption of critical maritime conduits is forcing a permanent migration of high-tech manufacturing away from the Indo-Pacific, ending the era of hyper-efficient global electronics logistics.

26 Sept 2026

The Riyadh Isolation: Saudi Arabia’s Post-American Pivot
Middle East

The Riyadh Isolation: Saudi Arabia’s Post-American Pivot

Saudi Arabia is systematically dismantling its eighty-year security reliance on Washington. This is not a diplomatic spat, but a calculated survival strategy to insulate Vision 2030 from the volatility of American domestic politics and regional entanglements.

25 Sept 2026

The Levantine Buffer: Israel’s Quiet Expansion into Southern Syria
Middle East

The Levantine Buffer: Israel’s Quiet Expansion into Southern Syria

As Tel Aviv establishes a 'de facto' security zone beyond the Golan, the traditional depth of the Axis of Resistance is collapsing. This geographic shift fundamentally rewires the cost of Iranian projection in the Levant.

22 Sept 2026

The Deterrence Mutation: Iran’s Shift to Direct Counter-Escalation
Middle East

The Deterrence Mutation: Iran’s Shift to Direct Counter-Escalation

Tehran has abandoned the strategic patience of the proxy era. By pivoting to direct, persistent counter-escalation, Iran is rewriting the rules of Middle Eastern engagement, forcing a permanent shift in how sovereign states manage regional friction.

22 Sept 2026