KJ ReportsKJ Reports

Who is Iran supporting in the Karabakh war between Armenia and Azerbaijan?

Hazem Zahab5 October 20201,369

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

Who is Iran supporting in the Karabakh war between Armenia and Azerbaijan?

Iran’s reported support of Armenia

Iran’s deep historical and geopolitical relationship with Armenia has led to many setting eyes on the former when war broke out between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the disputed Nagorno Karabakh region last week. It was speculated that Iran would come to the aid of Armenia in the conflict, despite its cultural and religious connection with Azerbaijain, which, like Iran, is a majority Shia country. As expected there have been several reports of Iran initiating support for the Armenian cause.

Recently, according to reports in Tehran-based local news hubs.  Iran which shares a 765-kilometer border with Azerbaijan has come to the aid of Armenia. According to unconfirmed reports in the Iranian media, the Persian country under the helm of President Hassan Rouhani has sent 200 heavy armoured tanks in a bid to protect its borders. However, according to military experts, the deployment of tanks in such a large number signals that Tehran could be lending a helping hand to Armenia.

Experts believe the tanks are not just meant for safeguarding the borders and territorial integrity of Iran, but for deployment in Yerevan on the call of the Armenian government in power. While there has been no official confirmation on the matter and there are no ways to verify the reports, the developments are in sync with what the Iranian Foreign Ministry had to say recently.

“Movements in the border areas of our country are being seriously and sensitively monitored by the Islamic Republic of Iran, and in this regard, while declaring any attack by any of the warring parties in the region on our country is intolerable, we seriously warn all parties to seriously take care in this regard.” said the Ministry.

While mortal shells and rockets did not cause any casualties inside Iranian territory, according to images and videos doing rounds on social media platforms, the projectiles have indeed damaged houses and farms located in the region.

However, Iran’s foreign ministry on Tuesday denied reports about transferring weapons and military equipment to Armenia. Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said Iran is carefully examining the goods that pass through its borders. “Iran will not allow any kind of weapon and ammunition transfer,” he told a press conference in Tehran. The spokesman said that non-military goods were still crossing between Iran and neighboring countries as usual, adding that the trucks suspected of carrying weapons were transporting normal commercial products.

Is popular opinion forcing Iran to align with Azerbaijan?

Meanwhile, it appears that Iran’s government has been pushed to side with Azerbaijan in the conflict, due to popular opinion in Iran, influenced by the sizeable Azeri population residing in Iran.

Protests have erupted in several Iranian cities, including the capital, Tehran, and and the northwestern city of Tabriz, in support of Azerbaijan in its conflict with Armenia over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh. Videos posted online appear to show dozens demonstrating in the streets while chanting slogans in Azeri, including “Karabakh is ours. It will remain ours.” Ethnic Azeris constitute a large minority of the Iranian population. Security forces were reported to have dispersed the protesters using tear gas. Clashes were also reported between the protesters and riot police.

Interestingly, on October 1, four representatives of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in four of the country’s provinces with a large ethnic Azeri population released a joint statement in support of Azerbaijan. The statement by Khamenei’s representatives in the provinces of West and East Azerbaijan, Ardebil, and Zanjan said that “there is no doubt” that the breakaway region belongs to Azerbaijan.

“There is no doubt that Nagorno-Karabakh belongs to Azerbaijan and its government’s move to recapture the region is completely legal, according to Shari’a, and in line with four Resolutions of the United Nation’s Security Council,” Khamenei’s representatives have asserted.

The signatories to the statement are mid-ranking clerics Hassan Alemi, Mohammad Ali Al-i Hashem, Ali Khatami, and Mehdi Qoreishi.

“The Azerbaijani government has acted in a completely legal and religious manner in recapturing these lands and has implemented four UN Security Council resolutions,” they wrote in their statement on Thursday. Furthermore, the statement referred to the Azerbaijani soldiers killed in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as “martyrs of the great nation of Azerbaijan” and wished them “heavenly high ranks.”

However, although this may seem like an open show of support for Azerbaijan, it may just be a public move to appease the azeri population in Iran, while quietly supporting Armenia in the war.

Iran might see mediation as the best solution

When considering Iran’s geopolitical ties with Armenia on one hand, and its sizeable Azeri population on the other, the most appropriate position for Iran to take would appear to be mediation of the conflict, and in fact, there are signs that Iran is open to this posibility.

“Iran has prepared a detailed plan, which will be pursued through making consultations with the two sides [of the conflict]. We hope that the two sides end the war, avoid targeting civilians, and know that Iran cannot tolerate clashes on its borders. We have carefully told our friends in both countries that they need to take the necessary care,” Saeed Khatibzadeh, the spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry. said in his weekly press conference on Monday, according to the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA).

He said Iran is in contact with all sides and pursues an “important mission.” The spokesman pointed out, “Iran is one of the few players that enjoys good relations with the two warring sides and other regional players. From now on, Iran will have a special position and an important mission.” Katibzadeh did not give any details about the Iranian plan but he implied that preventing encroachment on the Iranian territories may be part of this plan.

Iran’s official stance, after having tried to resolve the long-running conflict in previous decades through diplomatic means, remains one of mediation, calling for an immediate ceasefire and dialogue. Iran, which shares borders with both Armenia and Azerbaijan, last week reassured Azerbaijan that it recognises its territorial integrity and that it holds an important place in Iranian foreign policy.

Considering the various and opposing vested interests in the region, Iranian politician Mohammad Javad Jamali believes resolving the conflict is now more difficult than it was before. “We believe those who foment the killings, especially the US and Israel, would like the fires of conflict to remain aflame,” the former senior member of the Iranian parliament’s national security and foreign policy commission told Al Jazeera.

Iran has called on Armenia and Azerbaijan to stop the war and start a dialogue to resolve differences. “There is no military solution for this decades-long conflict. While respecting the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan, we reiterate that a ceasefire must be declared to start massive political talks,” Katibzadeh noted. From this, it appears that while Iran is taking the position of mediation, it is leaning towards Azerbaijan when highlighting the importance of its territorial integrity in Karabakh.

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Beijing Buffer: China’s Strategic Checkmate in the Persian Gulf
China

The Beijing Buffer: China’s Strategic Checkmate in the Persian Gulf

Beijing’s mediation of the US-Iran accord signals a fundamental shift in maritime power. By positioning itself as the indispensable guarantor of Gulf stability, China has effectively neutralized decades of Western naval dominance.

20 Jun 2026

The APRA Mandate: Australia’s Financial Hedging for a Post-US Order
United States

The APRA Mandate: Australia’s Financial Hedging for a Post-US Order

As Canberra adjusts its regulatory framework to account for intensifying geopolitical shocks, a deeper shift is occurring: Australia is decoupling its financial stability from the total reliance on the American security umbrella.

19 Jun 2026

The Silicon Strait: China’s Data Hegemony in the South China Sea
China

The Silicon Strait: China’s Data Hegemony in the South China Sea

Beijing is transforming the South China Sea from a contested waterway into a high-tech data corridor. By integrating AI infrastructure with maritime power, China is effectively bypassing the strategic vulnerability of the Malacca Strait.

18 Jun 2026

The Bismarckian Pivot: India’s German Deep-Tech Realignment
South Asia

The Bismarckian Pivot: India’s German Deep-Tech Realignment

As New Delhi systematically decouples from its legacy Russian military dependency, a new strategic architecture is emerging. Berlin is no longer just a trading partner; it is becoming India’s primary engine for industrial sovereignty.

17 Jun 2026

The Uralic Lever: Russia’s Strategic Pivot to New Delhi
Russia

The Uralic Lever: Russia’s Strategic Pivot to New Delhi

Moscow is trading short-term energy profits for a permanent strategic alliance with India. This shift signals the end of Russian dependency on European markets and the birth of a new Eurasian power axis.

17 Jun 2026

The Iranian Chokepoint: Why $200 Oil is Tehran’s Strategic Veto
Middle East

The Iranian Chokepoint: Why $200 Oil is Tehran’s Strategic Veto

As regional tensions escalate, Iran’s ability to throttle the Strait of Hormuz has transformed from a military threat into a sophisticated macroeconomic weapon designed to neutralise Western sanctions and leverage global energy markets.

16 Jun 2026