KJ ReportsKJ Reports

Russia – Ukraine Ceasefire: 5 Geopolitical Effects You Need to Know

Nikola Mikovic27 July 2019941

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

Russia – Ukraine Ceasefire: 5 Geopolitical Effects You Need to Know

1. “Indefinite” truce announced

Russia, Ukraine and the OSCE have announced an “indefinite” ceasefire in the Donbass. Since the beginning of the conflict in 2014 several ceasefires have been announced and none of them was ever respected. Both, Ukrainian armed forces and Russia backed Donetsk People’s (DPR) Republic and Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR) violated the truce on a daily basis.

2. Shelling goes on

It’s extremely unlikely that the brand new ceasefire will be implemented. Since the US never took part in any negotiations over the Donbass conflict in the past five years, chances for a sustainable truce are very slim. After the events in Maidan in Kiev in 2014, Ukraine is firmly under the US geopolitical sphere of influence.

Even though the ceasefire won’t come into the effect, any major military offensives are not likely to happen either. Due to fear of sanctions, Russia’s been preventing its proxies from capturing new territories since the Debaltsevo offensive in 2015. Ukraine, on the other hand, won’t dare to start a massive assault until it gets firm guarantees that Moscow won’t intervene. In the meantime, the people of  the Donbass will keep living under constant shelling.

3. No special status for the Donbass

Ukraine is not ready to recognise the special status of the Donbass under any circumstances, and that’s something that the Kremlin’s proposing. The Ukrainian society would see such move as an open betrayal, and it’s also unlikely that the West would agree with the idea. As long as the war in Donbass goes on, the EU and the US have a strong reason to keep imposing new packages of sanctions on Russia and weaken its economy. Russia is already spending a significant amount of money funding its proxies in the Donbass, and in the long term the price of keeping that territory under the Russian sphere of influence might be too high.

4. Donbass between Russia and Ukraine

The Kremlin is apparently looking for a way to reintegrate the Donbass into Ukraine. Local authorities in the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic and Lugansk People’s Republic recently held small rallies demanding from the newly elected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to end the war and approve the special status of the Donbass. Many in Russia, and in the Donbass as well, interpreted this as an act of betrayal claiming that the main goal of the uprising in 2014 was integration with Russia, according to the Crimean model, and not the special status within Ukraine.

5. Slow process of getting Russian citizenship

The self-proclaimed Donbass republics are fully integrated into Russian economy. Russian ruble already replaced Ukrainian hryvnia as the national currency, and Russian President Vladimir Putin recently signed a decree which makes it possible for residents of the DPR and LPR to obtain Russian citizenship under a simplified procedure. However, the process of “passportization” goes pretty slow, and so far only a few thousand out of roughly three million people received Russian passports.

In the long term, if all the residents of the self-proclaimed DPR and LPR become citizens of the Russian Federation, the situation will be quite similar to South Ossetia and Abkhazia before Moscow recognised their independence in 2008.

#america#ceasefire#donbass#eastern-europe#europe#geopolitics#russia#ukraine

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Northern Gambit: Moscow’s Hybrid Escalation against Europe
Russia

The Northern Gambit: Moscow’s Hybrid Escalation against Europe

Russia has shifted from conventional theatre warfare to a sustained drone and sabotage campaign across Western Europe. This is not a prelude to invasion, but a desperate leverage play to trade domestic security for sanctions relief.

24 Jun 2026

The End of Strategic Depth: Russia’s Northern Exposure
Russia

The End of Strategic Depth: Russia’s Northern Exposure

Moscow’s centuries-old defensive doctrine relied on vast geography to bleed invaders dry. Miniature, low-cost drone technology has rendered this buffer obsolete, forcing a structural rethink of Russian sovereignty and the vulnerability of its interior.

23 Jun 2026

The Scarcity Doctrine: Why Moscow Must Choose Between Front and Rear
Russia

The Scarcity Doctrine: Why Moscow Must Choose Between Front and Rear

A surge in long-range drone strikes is forcing the Kremlin into a zero-sum game. Russia can no longer shield its industrial heartland without starving its frontline forces of essential air defence layers.

23 Jun 2026

The Rhine-Dnieper Paradox: America’s Permanent Frontier in Europe
Russia

The Rhine-Dnieper Paradox: America’s Permanent Frontier in Europe

European strategic autonomy is frequently framed as a quest for independence from Washington. However, the structural reality suggests that for a unified Europe to lead itself, it requires a permanent American military presence to manage the continent’s internal trust deficit.

21 Jun 2026

The Uralic Lever: Russia’s Strategic Pivot to New Delhi
Russia

The Uralic Lever: Russia’s Strategic Pivot to New Delhi

Moscow is trading short-term energy profits for a permanent strategic alliance with India. This shift signals the end of Russian dependency on European markets and the birth of a new Eurasian power axis.

17 Jun 2026

Mare Clausum: Why the Black Sea is No Longer a Russian Lake
Russia

Mare Clausum: Why the Black Sea is No Longer a Russian Lake

As traditional naval power yields to asymmetric attrition, the Black Sea has become a laboratory for post-modern warfare. Kyiv’s victory in the naval war, achieved without a fleet, is rewriting the rules of global maritime security.

15 Sept 2025