KJ ReportsKJ Reports

Greek PM visits Libya: Why has Greece restored diplomatic relations with Libya?

Hazem Zahab8 April 2021876

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

Greek PM visits Libya: Why has Greece restored diplomatic relations with Libya?

Greek PM visits Libya and restores diplomatic ties

Greek Prime Minister, Kyriakos Mitsotakis confirmed that his country had restored diplomatic relations with Libya and increased its diplomatic representation.

This came during his meeting with the head of the Libyan Presidential Council, Mohammad Menfi, and the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Najla Al-Manqoush on Tuesday in Tripoli during which he announced the reopening of airspace between the two countries.

The two sides discussed aspects of bilateral cooperation between the two countries in various fields, in addition to the formation of joint committees, according to a statement by the Presidential Council.

“There will be cooperation between Libya and Greece in the economic and investment fields”, Menfi said, stressing that all agreements will be activated in all fields to serve the interests of the two peoples.

“It’s time to leave behind what has tested our relations in the past,” Mitsotakis said in televised remarks alongside Libya’s interim Prime Minister Abdulhamid Dbeibah.

Greece had ordered the expulsion of Libya’s current head of the Presidential Council, Mohammad Younes Menfi, who had served for almost a year as Libya’s ambassador in Greece, in December 2019 following a maritime agreement between Tripoli and Ankara. He remained in Greece with his family but without diplomatic status.

In November 2019, Turkey and Libya signed a maritime delimitation dealthat provided a legal framework to prevent any fait accompli by regional states. Accordingly, the attempts by the Greek government to appropriate huge parts of Libya’s continental shelf, when a political crisis hit the North African country in 2011, were averted.

Why has Greece chosen to revive ties?

Greece did not maintain relations with the Tripoli-based UN recognized, and Turkey-backed, GNA, which along with the opposing LNA, governed most of Libya before the introduction of the interim government this year. However, Greece has now re-opened relations with the new interim government.

The new interim government, is headed by a presidential council, and was formed with the backing of the UN. In a factor that could have certainly influenced Greece’s decision to initiate ties, in addition to the UN, the powerful backers of both the GNA and LNA have pledged their support for the new interim government, making it an authoritative, and powerful authority in Libya, with which ties would certainly benefit Greece and their regional interests.

Another reason for this decision, is the importance of Libya in Greece’s Mediterranean interests. This came to light in the meeting between Greek PM Kyriakos Mitsotakis, and the Libyan interim government. Mitsotakis, called on Libya to scrap the illegal 2019 maritime boundaries agreement with Turkey during his first visit to the country on Tuesday. Mitsotakis said in a joint press briefing with Libyan Prime Minister Abdulhamid Dbeibeh in Tripoli that for Greece “it is very important, the annulment of illegal documents.

“They were presented as supposedly transnational agreements but have no legal effect, as expressly stated by the European Council.”

Athens is fiercely opposed to the deal between Ankara and Tripoli, which claims much of the Mediterranean for energy exploration and as an Exclusive Economic Zone, conflicting with the claims by Greece, Cyprus and Egypt.

Was the visit a failure?

The Greek PM’s visit to Libya can be considered a partial failure, as Dbeibeh expressed readiness for talks with Greece on the demarcation of maritime zones and to set up joint committees for this, but clearly separating the memorandum with Turkey, noting that his government’s main priority is the interests of Libya.

Mitsotakis also noted that the issue of maritime zones will affect not only Greek-Libyan relations, but also the North African country’s relations with the European Union.

He also dropped clear hints about the Turkish presence in Libya, stressing that Greece will stand by Tripoli in the runup to the elections, “away from foreign armies and interests.” Libya does not appear to agree with this proposed cut in Turkish ties.

However, there were several positives from the meeting as well, as Mitsotakis referred to the multiple opportunities for economic cooperation between Greece and Libya and highlighted the importance of the defense bond between the two countries, recalling that “more than 280 Libyan officers have graduated in recent decades from the schools of the Hellenic Armed Forces.” He also noted that Libyan Coast Guard officials have been trained in Greece.

Meanwhile Tuesday, during a visit to Ankara discuss trade and refugees, European Council President Charles Michel urged Turkey to keep working to resolve disputes with Greece and Cyprus over gas rights in the Mediterranean.

The visit by Michel and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen follows the EU’s statement at a summit last month that work could begin on deeper trade ties and more financial support to Turkey to deal with refugees.

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Amman Alignment: Jordan’s Break from the Pan-Arabist Fiction
Middle East

The Amman Alignment: Jordan’s Break from the Pan-Arabist Fiction

Jordan’s recent kinetic intervention against Iranian ordnance signals a fundamental shift in Levantine architecture. Amman has traded the ghost of pan-Arab solidarity for a hard-nosed survivalist pact with Western and Israeli security frameworks.

29 Jul 2026

The Iraqi Re-Alignment: Sovereignty vs Security in a Bipolar Baghdad
Middle East

The Iraqi Re-Alignment: Sovereignty vs Security in a Bipolar Baghdad

Baghdad faces a terminal dilemma as the dual-track presence of Iranian influence and American financial-military support becomes unsustainable. The era of playing both sides has reached its structural limit.

29 Jul 2026

The Hegemon’s Fatigue: The End of US Forward Presence
United States

The Hegemon’s Fatigue: The End of US Forward Presence

Internal legislative paralysis and the erosion of executive war powers signal a structural shift in American grand strategy. Washington is no longer withdrawing by choice, but by domestic necessity, ending the era of global forward presence.

28 Jul 2026

The Hormuz Leverage: Why Tehran Engineered an Oil Crisis
Middle East

The Hormuz Leverage: Why Tehran Engineered an Oil Crisis

Conventional analysis views Iran’s maritime aggression as a tactical reaction to sanctions. In reality, Tehran is pursuing a deliberate strategy to force global oil prices into a permanent risk premium to fund its internal survival.

26 Jul 2026

The Infrastructure Ultimatum: Resetting Deterrence via Civilian Pain
United States

The Infrastructure Ultimatum: Resetting Deterrence via Civilian Pain

Washington has abandoned the pursuit of surgical military strikes in favour of targeting the dual-use infrastructure that keeps modern societies functioning. The shift signals a desperate attempt to regain leverage over Tehran without starting a ground war.

26 Jul 2026

The Attrition Doctrine: Why Washington Abandoned Managed Escalation
United States

The Attrition Doctrine: Why Washington Abandoned Managed Escalation

Under the second Trump administration, the United States has pivoted from cautious proxy support to the systematic destruction of adversary infrastructure. This shift marks the definitive end of the post-Cold War era of calibrated conflict management.

25 Jul 2026