KJ ReportsKJ Reports

The Great Game of the 19th Century

2 September 20172,311

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

The Great Game of the 19th Century

The Great Game  was an intense rivalry between the British and Russian Empires in Central Asia, beginning in the nineteenth century

British Lord Ellenborough started “The Great Game” on January 12, 1830, with an edict establishing a new trade route from India to Bukhara, using Turkey, Persia and Afghanistan

The aim was to create a buffer against Russia to prevent it from controlling any ports on the Persian Gulf.

Meanwhile, Russia wanted to establish a neutral zone in Afghanistan allowing for their use of crucial trade routes.

This resulted in a series of unsuccessful wars for the British to control Afghanistan, Bukhara and Turkey.

The British lost at all four wars — the First Anglo-Saxon War (1838), the First Anglo-Sikh War (1843), the Second Anglo-Sikh War (1848) and the Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878) — resulting in Russia taking control of several Khanates including Bukhara.

Although Britain’s attempts to conquer Afghanistan ended in humiliation, the independent nation held as a buffer between Russia and India

The Great Game officially ended with the Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907, which divided Persia into a Russian-controlled northern zone, a nominally independent central zone, and a British-controlled southern zone.

The Convention also specified a borderline between the two empires running from the eastern point of Persia to Afghanistan and declared Afghanistan an official protectorate of Britain.

Relations between the two European powers continued to be strained until they allied against the Central Powers in World War I

The term “Great Game” was popularized by Rudyard Kipling in his book “Kim” from 1904, wherein he plays up the idea of power struggles between great nations as a game of sorts.

Today, the Great Game is often quoted to describe the Geopolitical competition between America, China and Russia over Central Asia.

Afghanistan plays a vital geopolitical role in this Great Game as it borders Central Asia

The Struggle for Afghanistan lies in an even Greater Game for control over the Eurasian Landmass

This theory was first talked about by Sir Halford Mackinder but reinforced by Nicholas Spykman where he famously outlined his core geopolitical argument in 1944

“Who controls the Rimland rules Eurasia, who rules Eurasia controls the destiny of the world”

#19th-century-great-game#anglo-afghan-war#britain#britain-geopolitics#british-empire#british-empire-19th-century#british-empire-documentary#british-history#bukhara#central-asia-great-game#geopolitics#history-of-the-great-game#ottoman-caliphate#ottoman-empire#persia#persian-empire#russia#russia-britsh-history#russia-geopolitics#russia-history#russia-uk-19th-century#the-great-game#the-great-game-19th-century#the-great-game-britain-and-russia-in-central-asia#the-great-game-of-britain#the-great-game-russia-britain#the-new-great-game

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Rupee-Riyal Axis: Energy Debt as Geopolitical Leverage
South Asia

The Rupee-Riyal Axis: Energy Debt as Geopolitical Leverage

As Islamabad swaps sovereign equity for Saudi oil credits, a new security architecture is emerging. Riyadh is no longer just a donor; it is the silent arbiter of the Indo-Pakistani strategic balance.

19 Jul 2026

The Sudano-Sahelian Vacuum: A New Continental Struggle for Power
History

The Sudano-Sahelian Vacuum: A New Continental Struggle for Power

The collapse of the Sudanese state has created a geopolitical void that is forcing a radical rearmament across the Sahel. This is no longer local civil war; it is a structural race for African resource sovereignty.

16 Jul 2026

The Ankara Schism: NATO as a Transactional Clearinghouse
History

The Ankara Schism: NATO as a Transactional Clearinghouse

Turkey is no longer a peripheral partner but a central disruptor. By prioritising regional sovereignty over collective security, Ankara has transformed NATO from a mutual defence union into a marketplace for national interests.

13 Jul 2026

The Pashtun Fracture: The Durand Line’s Structural Collapse
South Asia

The Pashtun Fracture: The Durand Line’s Structural Collapse

As conflict destabilises Tehran, the artificial border between Afghanistan and Pakistan is dissolving. KJ examines why the 2026 regional upheaval has finally broken the 133-year-old territorial status quo, threatening Pakistan’s western integrity.

13 Jul 2026

The Himalayan Bypass: New Delhi’s Pivot to Bilateral Coercion
South Asia

The Himalayan Bypass: New Delhi’s Pivot to Bilateral Coercion

As Bangladesh's internal stability fractures, India is abandoning decades of regional multilateralism. New Delhi is shifting toward a strategy of bilateral force and infrastructure bypass to secure its restive Northeast against a deepening chaotic void.

12 Jul 2026

The Indus Prerogative: India’s Turn Toward Hydrological Hegemony
South Asia

The Indus Prerogative: India’s Turn Toward Hydrological Hegemony

New Delhi is abandoning decades of water diplomacy. Faced with a cooling economy and warming climate, India is leveraging its upstream geography to redefine power dynamics with Pakistan, risking the collapse of a sixty-year-old peace treaty.

5 Jul 2026