KJ ReportsKJ Reports

Strategic Black Sea falls by the wayside in impeachment controversy

James M. Dorsey3 February 2020645

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

Strategic Black Sea falls by the wayside in impeachment controversy

Presidents
Donald J. Trump and Recep Tayyip Erdogan had a plateful of thorny issues on
their agenda when they met in the White House this week.

None of the issues, including Turkey’s recent invasion of
northern Syria, its acquisition of a Russian anti-missile system and its close
ties to Russia and Iran, appear to have been resolved during the meeting
between the two men in which five Republican senators critical of Turkey participated.

The failure to narrow differences didn’t stop Mr. Trump
from declaring that “we’ve been friends for a long time, almost from
day-one. We understand each other’s country. We understand where we are coming from.”

Mr. Trump’s display of empathy for an illiberal leader was
however not the only tell-tale sign of the president’s instincts. So was what
was not on the two men’s agenda: security in the Black Sea that lies at the
crossroads of Russia, Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and NATO member Turkey.

The Black Sea is a flashpoint in multiple disputes
involving Russia and its civilizationalist definition of a Russian world that
stretches far beyond the country’s internationally recognized borders and
justifies its interventions in Black Sea littoral states like Ukraine and
Georgia.

The significance of the absence of the Black Sea on the
White House agenda is magnified by the disclosure days earlier that Mr. Trump
had initially cancelled a US freedom of navigation naval mission in the Black
Sea after CNN had portrayed it as American pushback in the region.

The disclosure came in a transcript of closed-door testimony in the US
House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry of Mr. Trump’s policy towards
Ukraine by Christopher Anderson, a former advisor to Kurt Volker, the US
special representative to Ukraine until he resigned in September.

Mr. Anderson testified that Mr. Trump phoned his then
national security advisor, John Bolton, at home to complain about the CNN
story. He said the story prompted the president to cancel the routine operation
of which Turkey had already been notified.

The cancellation occurred at a moment that reports were
circulating in the State Department about an effort to review US assistance to
Ukraine.

“We met with Ambassador Bolton and discussed this, and he
made it clear that the president had called him to complain about that news
report… I can’t speculate as to why…but that…operation was cancelled, but then
we were able to get a second one for later in February. And we had an
Arleigh-class destroyer arrive in Odessa on the fifth anniversary of the Crimea
invasion,” Mr. Anderson said.

The operation was cancelled weeks after the Russian coast guard fired on Ukrainian vessels
transiting the Strait of Kerch that connects the Black Sea to the Sea of Azov
and separates Russian-annexed Crimea from Russian mainland. ‘This was a
dramatic escalation,” Mr. Anderson said.

Mr.
Trump at the time put a temporary hold on a condemnatory statement similar to
ones that had been issued by America’s European allies. Ultimately, statements
were issued by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the United Nations
ambassador Nikki Haley but not by the White House.

The
Black Sea’s absence in Mr. Trump’s talks with the Turkish leader coupled with
the initial cancellation of the freedom of navigation operation, the initially
meek US response to the Strait of Kerch incident, and the fallout of the
impeachment inquiry do little to inspire confidence in US policy in key Black
Sea countries that include not only Turkey, Ukraine and Georgia, a strategic
gateway to Central Asia, but also NATO members Bulgaria and Romania.

In
Georgia, protesters gathered this week outside of parliament
after lawmakers failed to pass a constitutional amendment that would have
introduced a proportional election system in advance of elections scheduled for
next year.

The
amendment was one demand of protesters that have taken to the streets in
Georgia since June in demonstrations that at times included anti-Russian
slogans.

Russia
and Georgia fought a brief war in 2008 and Russia has since recognized the self-declared
independence of two Georgian regions
, Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

Some
1500 US troops participated in June in annual joint
exercises with the Georgian military
that were originally initiated
to prepare Georgian units for service in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The
absence of the Black Sea in Mr. Trump’s talks with Mr. Erdogan raises the
spectre that the region could become a victim of the partisan divide in
Washington and/or Mr. Trump’s political priorities.

The
Republican-dominated US Senate has yet to consider a bipartisan Georgia Support Act that was last month
passed by the House of Representatives.
The act would significantly
strengthen US defense, economic, and cyber security ties with Georgia.

A
Chinese delegation that included representatives of several Chinese-led
business associations as well as mobile operator China Unicom visited the breakaway republic of Abkhazia this week
to discuss the creation of a special trade zone to manufacture cell phones as
well as electric cars.

The
Black Sea is one region where the United States cannot afford to sow doubt. The
damage, however, may already have been done.

Warned
Black Sea security scholar Iulia-Sabina Joja in a recent study: “The region is
(already) inhospitable for Western countries as they struggle to provide
security… The primary cause of this insecurity is the Russian
Federation
… Today, Russia uses its enhanced Black Sea capabilities
not only to destabilize the region militarily, politically, and economically,
but also to move borders, acquire territory, and project power into the
Mediterranean.”

Ms.
Joja went on to suggest that “a common threat assessment of NATO members and
partners is the key to a stable Black Sea. Only by exploring common ground and
working towards shared deterrence can they enhance regional security.”

#black-sea

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Aden Choke: Global Maritime Liberalism Under Final Siege
Geopolitics

The Aden Choke: Global Maritime Liberalism Under Final Siege

The Red Sea crisis has evolved from a regional skirmish into a systemic failure of Western sea power. As non-state actors disrupt the Suez artery, the era of guaranteed oceanic freedom is ending, replaced by a fragmented, costly reality.

8 Sept 2026

The Qasem Gambit: Why Tehran’s Maritime Strategy Breaks US Naval Power
Middle East

The Qasem Gambit: Why Tehran’s Maritime Strategy Breaks US Naval Power

Iran’s evolution into a sophisticated anti-access maritime power has rendered the traditional US carrier strike group obsolete in the Persian Gulf, forcing a fundamental rethink of Western power projection in the Middle East.

8 Sept 2026

The Fujairah Paradox: The End of the Western Security Umbrella
Middle East

The Fujairah Paradox: The End of the Western Security Umbrella

As Iranian drone incursions breach the strategic Port of Fujairah, the UAE is quietly dismantling its reliance on Western protection. This shift marks the rise of a new, transactional security architecture in the Gulf.

7 Sept 2026

The Emirates Buffer: Abu Dhabi’s Strategic Disengagement
Middle East

The Emirates Buffer: Abu Dhabi’s Strategic Disengagement

As tensions between Washington and Tehran reach a volatile equilibrium, the United Arab Emirates is quietly decoupling its security architecture from Western-led containment to pursue a policy of radical neutrality and economic preservation.

7 Sept 2026

The Larak Conundrum: Tehran’s Shift to Preemptive Deterrence
Middle East

The Larak Conundrum: Tehran’s Shift to Preemptive Deterrence

Iran has abandoned the doctrine of 'strategic patience' for a model of proactive intervention. This shift signals the death of managed escalation and introduces a volatile new era for global energy security and maritime power.

6 Sept 2026

The Larak Escalation: Tehran’s New Doctrine of Preemptive Defence
Middle East

The Larak Escalation: Tehran’s New Doctrine of Preemptive Defence

Iran has abandoned its long-standing policy of 'strategic patience' for a high-risk preemptive doctrine. By striking first near Larak, Tehran signals that the era of proportional response is dead, reshapping the Persian Gulf power map.

6 Sept 2026