KJ ReportsKJ Reports

Nord Stream 2 Gas Pipeline: 5 Geopolitical Effects You Need to Know

Hazem Zahab2 August 2019962

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

Nord Stream 2 Gas Pipeline: 5 Geopolitical Effects You Need to Know

1. What is Nord Stream 2?

Nord Stream 2 is a gas pipeline currently under construction from Russia to Germany via the Baltic Sea. The new pipeline will run alongside the already constructed Nord Stream and will double the amount of gas being funnelled through the Baltics to 110 billion cubic meters per year. The pipeline is expected to be operational by the beginning of 2020 and intends to provide Europe with a sustainable gas supply while providing Russia with more direct access to the European gas market. But the project is facing strong opposition from Poland, and other European nations, as well as the United States.

2. Denmark slowing the project down

A delay in approval from Denmark could lead Russia to miss the deadline to begin pumping gas to Europe through the controversial Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline. The €9.5bn link that will carry gas from Kremlin-controlled Gazprom to Germany has received authorisation from several of the Baltic Sea nations whose waters it will cross, but not Denmark. Permit applications with the Danish Energy Agency for two different proposed routes have been pending for months, throwing the planned year-end launch date into doubt. Such a delay would hurt the project as its intention to double the output of Nord Stream 1 would be postponed.

3. The US to impose sanctions on the project

The US Senate committee have recently passed a bill to impose sanctions on companies and firms involved in the construction of Nord Stream 2. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed the “Protecting Europe’s Energy Security Act,” by a vote of 20 to 2. The bill, which reflects some legislators’ concerns over Russian influence in Europe, still needs to pass the full US Senate, US House of Representatives and be signed by President Donald Trump into law. However, it appears clear that it will be approved by all parties. This could cause a further delay to the project, and in a worst-case scenario may halt it, but it is unlikely to be completely abandoned.

4. Russia accuses EU of trying to stall their progress

Russia’s frustration regarding the obstacles to the project is showing, as Gazprom said on Friday it had asked the Court of Justice of the European Union to annul an EU gas directive, which dictates the pipes cannot be directly owned by a gas supplier. The EU tightened regulations on Nord Stream 2 out of concerns the pipeline would give too much control of the EU’s energy supply to Russia. Critics are also worried that the pipeline could deliver a major blow to Ukraine’s economy because, along with its TurkStream (a pipeline that runs from Russia to Turkey), Russia would be able to completely bypass Ukrainian lines, leaving Kyiv without gas transit fees.

5. Progress being made regardless

Despite the many obstacles now coming into play, Russia has managed to work so fast, that Gazprom has declared the Nord Stream II pipeline, as 71% completed. “Construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline continues. In all, 1,739.4 km of the gas pipeline has been laid on the bottom of the Baltic Sea by now about 71% of its total length,” Gazprom reported, reported Russian state news agency TASS. It is clear that the project will go ahead and will be completed soon, and the recent complications will only add slight delays. It is nearly impossible to stop Russia’s imposing project in Europe now.

#denmark#europe#germany#nord-stream-2#russia#united-states

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Hegemon’s Fatigue: The End of US Forward Presence
United States

The Hegemon’s Fatigue: The End of US Forward Presence

Internal legislative paralysis and the erosion of executive war powers signal a structural shift in American grand strategy. Washington is no longer withdrawing by choice, but by domestic necessity, ending the era of global forward presence.

28 Jul 2026

The Infrastructure Ultimatum: Resetting Deterrence via Civilian Pain
United States

The Infrastructure Ultimatum: Resetting Deterrence via Civilian Pain

Washington has abandoned the pursuit of surgical military strikes in favour of targeting the dual-use infrastructure that keeps modern societies functioning. The shift signals a desperate attempt to regain leverage over Tehran without starting a ground war.

26 Jul 2026

The Attrition Doctrine: Why Washington Abandoned Managed Escalation
United States

The Attrition Doctrine: Why Washington Abandoned Managed Escalation

Under the second Trump administration, the United States has pivoted from cautious proxy support to the systematic destruction of adversary infrastructure. This shift marks the definitive end of the post-Cold War era of calibrated conflict management.

25 Jul 2026

The Islamabad Memorandum: Ending the Age of American Interventionalism
United States

The Islamabad Memorandum: Ending the Age of American Interventionalism

The landmark agreement in Pakistan signals a definitive shift in US grand strategy. By trading military dominance for regional pacification, Washington has acknowledged that its internal populist pressures now outweigh its external imperial ambitions.

1 Jul 2026

The Populist Ceiling: The End of American Hegemony in the Persian Gulf
United States

The Populist Ceiling: The End of American Hegemony in the Persian Gulf

Domestic electoral fatigue is forcing Washington to abandon its role as the Gulf's maritime guarantor. As populist incentives override strategic doctrine, a terminal de-escalation is reshaping the global energy order.

30 Jun 2026

The Atlantic Schism: Europe’s Industrial Logic Defeats NATO Unity
United States

The Atlantic Schism: Europe’s Industrial Logic Defeats NATO Unity

As American protectionism and high energy costs hollow out the European heartland, the Continent is quietly decoupling from Washington's security architecture to preserve its industrial base through pragmatic deals with the East.

29 Jun 2026