KJ ReportsKJ Reports

Is the US letting the Taliban loose at the cost of Afghanistan? 5 Geopolitical Effects You Need to Know

Hazem Zahab19 August 2019921

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

Is the US letting the Taliban loose at the cost of Afghanistan? 5 Geopolitical Effects You Need to Know

1. Does the latest suicide bomb put the deal with the US at risk?

On Saturday night, a suicide bomber killed at least 63 people and wounded 182 in an explosion at a packed wedding hall in Kabul. An Afghan government spokesperson said the bomber detonated inside the wedding reception, where more than 1,000 guests had gathered to celebrate a marriage. “Everybody was running,” a waiter at the hall, Sayed Agha Shah, told Reuters. “Several of our waiters were killed and wounded.” A spokesperson for Afghanistan’s president, Ashraf Ghani, called the attack a “heinous crime against our people,” Glasse says.  No group has claimed responsibility for the bombing and the Taliban denied being behind it. However, it is possible that the Taliban is behind it and trying to cover up the attack in light of ongoing negotiations with the US. If this is true, it could put negotiations with the US for its withdrawal from Afghanistan at risk, as the Taliban would be seen as untrustworthy.

2. Taliban says differences with the US resolved

Meanwhile, the Taliban have appeared to have found a deal with the US regarding the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, as Zalmay Khalilzad, the American envoy who has been leading the talks since they began late last year, tweeted that they had made “excellent progress.” The Taliban have kept up a near-daily rate of deadly attacks, despite holding several rounds of peace talks with Khalilzad since his appointment almost a year ago. The Taliban now control roughly half of Afghanistan and are at their strongest since 2001, when the U.S.-led invasion toppled their government after it harboured al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden. The US is, therefore, withdrawing at the wrong time according to some.

3. Trump says America is close to deal with Taliban

Trump has given off positive signals regarding the deal, saying: “Many on the opposite side of this 19-year war, and us, are looking to make a deal if possible!”The framework would allow for a phased withdrawal of US troops, with the Taliban committed in return to severing ties with al-Qaida, and to prevent them and other extremist groups from operating in, or from, areas they control. That would allow Trump to claim success in his long-standing goal of ending the US’s longest war and bringing 14,000 troops home. The Taliban would be able to claim it had achieved its central aim of driving out foreign troops. However, the latest developments could act as obstacles slowing down the move. However, it seems the US is willing to sacrifice the will of the Afghani government and even peace, for the conclusion of negotiations with the Taliban, to act as a victory for the Trump administration.

4. Brother of Taliban chief killed

In the latest event that could slow down negotiations with the US, the younger brother of Afghan Taliban chief Hibatullah Akhundzada was said to be among at least four people killed in a bomb blast at an Islamic seminary in a southwestern part of neighbouring Pakistan. There were no immediate claims of responsibly for the attack in a Pakistani province, which has long served as a hiding place for Taliban leaders and fighters waging a deadly insurgency against U.S.-backed government in Afghanistan. His death could shift the blame to either Pakistan or the US, which would deeply hurt negotiations for a peaceful solution in Afghanistan.

5. Pakistan working with the US

During the meeting between President Trump and PM Khan which took place at the White House last month, Trump said that Pakistan was helping the US to “extricate” its troops from Afghanistan, through political negotiations. Prime Minister Khan displayed his agreement and acknowledgement of this, saying: “There is no military solution in Afghanistan. If you go all-out military, millions and millions of people will die.” However, Trump also attempted to pressure Imran Khan to convince the Taliban to strike a peace deal with the Afghan government to avoid unnecessary violence, stating that “We’re like policemen. We’re not fighting a war. If we wanted to fight a war in Afghanistan and win it, I could win that war in a week. But I don’t want to kill 10 million people. Afghanistan could be wiped off the face of the Earth. I don’t want to go that route.” Nevertheless, the comments from Trump and Khan display a willingness to work together to resolve the conflict in Afghanistan as soon as possible. 

#afghanistan#pakistan#taliban#united-states

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Atlanta Pivot: Why Football Just Ended the Monroe Doctrine
United States

The Atlanta Pivot: Why Football Just Ended the Monroe Doctrine

As the 2026 World Cup concludes in the heart of the American South, the absence of US influence over its Latin neighbours reveals a profound structural shift: the total collapse of Washington’s regional hegemony.

3 Sept 2026

The Durand Fracture: Why Islamabad and Kabul Have Reached a Dead End
South Asia

The Durand Fracture: Why Islamabad and Kabul Have Reached a Dead End

Pakistan’s decades-long pursuit of ‘strategic depth’ in Afghanistan has collapsed into a structural rivalry. Internal economic decay and shifting militant loyalties are now forcing a permanent divorce between former patrons and their proxies.

29 Aug 2026

The Dollar Siege: Trump’s Tehran Strategy and the Global Fracture
United States

The Dollar Siege: Trump’s Tehran Strategy and the Global Fracture

Washington’s aggressive push to disconnect Iran from the global financial system is forcing allies and rivals into a parallel economy. This tactical victory risks a long-term strategic retreat for the US Dollar’s global primacy.

22 Aug 2026

The Anatolia-Indus Axis: A New Security Core Outside the West
South Asia

The Anatolia-Indus Axis: A New Security Core Outside the West

The formalisation of the Riyadh-Ankara-Islamabad defence triangle marks the collapse of post-1945 security norms. It is a strategic pivot driven by sovereign survival, technological parity, and the death of Western reliability.

20 Aug 2026

The Dhaka Disconnect: New Delhi’s Neighbourhood Policy Collapse
South Asia

The Dhaka Disconnect: New Delhi’s Neighbourhood Policy Collapse

India’s strategic reliance on a single political dynasty in Bangladesh has backfired. As Dhaka pivots toward Beijing and Islamabad, New Delhi faces a structural security dilemma that threatens its entire eastern flank.

18 Aug 2026

The Durango Hedge: Mexico’s Role in the Great Tech Decoupling
United States

The Durango Hedge: Mexico’s Role in the Great Tech Decoupling

As Washington and Beijing sever semiconductor ties, Mexico is transforming from a low-cost assembly hub into the critical fail-safe for the AI era. Power, geography, and North American energy are rewriting the rules of silicon sovereignty.

16 Aug 2026