KJ ReportsKJ Reports

China and Russia are ready but not hungry for war with US should escalations develop with Iran

Hazem Zahab6 January 2020679

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

China and Russia are ready but not hungry for war with US should escalations develop with Iran

China and Russia show that Iran is not isolated in the latest drills

China and Russia have shown last week, that they are in a strong military relationship with Iran, and that Iran is not an isolated military power in the region as the US would like it to be.

For the first time in history, Iran, Russia and China have held naval military war games in the Sea of Oman, and the Indian Ocean over the past week, starting on the 27th of December. The manoeuvre is Tehran’s clear message to those countries that seek to isolate Iran through economic and political pressure. Through holding this joint manoeuvre, Tehran sent this warning to the foes that the Islamic Republic is a power that world powers such as Russia and China cannot close their eyes to.

The wargame at a time that the harshest sanctions in history are being introduced against Iran shows that Beijing and Moscow have a great potential to establish “strategic partnership” with Iran.

In fact, the joint manoeuvre signifies the strength of Iran’s position in the Persian Gulf, as well as the US’s increasing isolation. This comes after the US called 60 countries across the globe to join their coalition global naval alliance, with no country accepting to join except Washington’s traditional allies. Many allies of the US such as Egypt, Kuwait, Japan and Germany refused to join.

Russia has also shown that it is unlikely to stay neutral if Iran and the US go to war, as the geopolitical fallout from a regime change in Teheran will significantly outweigh the potential economic benefits for them. Particularly, a direct confrontation between Tehran and Washington that could bring back major U.S. military build-up is a geopolitical challenge that threatens Russia’s interests in the Middle East. Moscow has already blamed the U.S. for provoking Iran and has shown its opposition to the U.S. tightening pressure on Tehran’s defence program by recognizing Iran’s legitimate defence interests.

Iran is crucial to China’s strategies

For China, Iran is a crucial tool in its developing economic and geopolitical expansion, and political stability is important for that. Should the US start a war with Iran, China’s interests in Asia would be at risk.

Up to now, China has tried to balance its relationship with Saudi Arabia and Iran in the Middle East and set up a firewall between the two, although Iran is more significant in China’s strategic calculus given the fact Saudi Arabia and other Arab Gulf countries are still under the US security umbrella and host US military bases.

Most important, China needs Iran in the “east flank” of the Persian Gulf to prevent a full blockade by the US Navy, as China is a nett importer of oil and obtains half its supply from the Persian Gulf. Yet the US Navy maintains control of the sea lines of communications. As such, China is worried about the US restriction of China’s oil imports.

The trade war between the US and China has made this possibility even more likely and dangerous. Hence, their concerns were clear after the US assassination of Iranian general Qasem Suleimani. China’s foreign minister said the United States should stop abusing the use of force and seek solutions via dialogue, perhaps showing that even though China is keen on defending its interests, it does not want war.

War in the Persian Gulf is not favourable for Russia and China 

Although it appears that both Russia and China would take military action should the US and Iran go to war, it is clear that they do not intend to go to war, and are hoping for a de-escalation between the US and Iran.

In fact, China will play a constructive role in maintaining peace and security in the Middle East Gulf region, the Chinese foreign ministry said in a statement, citing Wang on the call. Peace in the region is crucial for China to realize its economic plans as highlighted earlier.

Similarly, Moscow clearly isn’t intending to get caught up in a military conflict between Iran and the U.S. and thus will employ every measure possible to minimize the risks of a direct confrontation between the two powers. Russia similarly condemned the killing of Suleimani as detrimental to regional peace.

However, this does not mean that Russia has no other options but to remain inactive or limit her support to mere diplomatic assistance. On the contrary, Moscow has no desire for a major power shift in the Middle East in favour of the U.S. Thus, opposite to what American administration wishes, it is not likely that Moscow takes a completely neutral stance on the looming crisis.

 

#china#russia#usa

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Hegemon’s Fatigue: The End of US Forward Presence
United States

The Hegemon’s Fatigue: The End of US Forward Presence

Internal legislative paralysis and the erosion of executive war powers signal a structural shift in American grand strategy. Washington is no longer withdrawing by choice, but by domestic necessity, ending the era of global forward presence.

28 Jul 2026

The Infrastructure Ultimatum: Resetting Deterrence via Civilian Pain
United States

The Infrastructure Ultimatum: Resetting Deterrence via Civilian Pain

Washington has abandoned the pursuit of surgical military strikes in favour of targeting the dual-use infrastructure that keeps modern societies functioning. The shift signals a desperate attempt to regain leverage over Tehran without starting a ground war.

26 Jul 2026

The Attrition Doctrine: Why Washington Abandoned Managed Escalation
United States

The Attrition Doctrine: Why Washington Abandoned Managed Escalation

Under the second Trump administration, the United States has pivoted from cautious proxy support to the systematic destruction of adversary infrastructure. This shift marks the definitive end of the post-Cold War era of calibrated conflict management.

25 Jul 2026

The Seoul Divergence: Strategic Autonomy and the New Pacific Order
China

The Seoul Divergence: Strategic Autonomy and the New Pacific Order

South Korea is decoupling its economic survival from the American security umbrella. As Seoul hedges between Washington and Beijing, the traditional 'Dollar-Security' nexus that defined East Asia for eighty years is quietly collapsing into a new multi-polar reality.

24 Jul 2026

The Won Pivot: Seoul’s Strategic Decoupling from the Dollar
China

The Won Pivot: Seoul’s Strategic Decoupling from the Dollar

South Korea is aggressively revaluation the Won to insulate its economy from American fiscal volatility. This shift marks a fundamental move from security dependence to financial autonomy as Seoul prepares for a multi-polar Pacific order.

22 Jul 2026

The Straits Gambit: Why Malaya and Singapore are Withdrawing from the US-China Maritime Attrition War
China

The Straits Gambit: Why Malaya and Singapore are Withdrawing from the US-China Maritime Attrition War

As the US-China 'Cold War II' accelerates, Singapore and Malaysia are moving beyond neutrality. By diversifying key infrastructure and pivoting to 'minilateral' regional hubs, they are actively decoupling from the superpower maritime attrition game.

17 Jul 2026