KJ ReportsKJ Reports

Pakistan puts press freedom at the core of struggle for new world order

James M. Dorsey5 March 2020842

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

Pakistan puts press freedom at the core of struggle for new world order

Sweeping new regulations restricting
social media in Pakistan
put freedom
of expression and the media at the heart of the struggle to counter both
civilizationalist and authoritarian aspects of an emerging new world order.

The regulations, adopted without public debate,
position US social media companies like Facebook and Twitter at the forefront
of the struggle and raise the spectre of China’s walled off Internet with its
own state-controlled social media platforms becoming the model for a host of
illiberals, authoritarians and autocrats.

The regulations, that take effect immediately, embrace
aspects of a civilizational state that defines its legal reach, if not its
borders, in terms of a civilization rather than a nation state with clearly
outlined, internationally recognized borders that determine the reach of its
law and that is defined by its population and language.

The regulations could force social media companies to
globally suppress criticism of the more onerous aspects of Pakistani law,
including constitutionally enshrined discrimination of some minorities like
Ahmadis, a sect widely viewed as heretic by mainstream Islam, and imposition of
a mandatory death sentence for blasphemy.

The new rules force social media companies to “remove, suspend or
disable access” to content posted in Pakistan or by Pakistani nationals abroad
that the government deems as failing to “take due cognizance of the religious,
cultural, ethnic and national security sensitivities of Pakistan.” The government
can also demand removal of encryption.

Social media companies are required to establish
offices in Pakistan in the next three months and install data servers by
February 2021.

The government justified the rules with the need to combat hate speech, blasphemy,
alleged fake news and online harassment of women
.

The Asia Internet Coalition, a technology and internet
industry association that includes
Facebook and Twitter, warned that the regulations “jeopardize the personal safety and
privacy of citizens and undermine free expression”
and would be “detrimental to Pakistan’s ambitions for
a digital economy.”

The introduction of the regulations reflects
frustration in government as well as Pakistan’s powerful military with social
media companies’ frequent refusal to honour requests to take down content.
Pakistan ranked among the top countries requesting  Facebook and Twitter to remove postings.

On the assumption that Facebook, Twitter and others,
which are already banned in China, will risk being debarred in Pakistan by
refusing to comply with the new regulations, Pakistan could become a prime
country that adopts not only aspects of China’s 21st century,
Orwellian surveillance state but also its tightly controlled media.

The basis for potential Pakistani
adoption of the Chinese system was created in 2017 in plans for the China Pakistan
Economic Corridor (CPEC),
a US$60
billion plus crown jewel of the Belt and Road, an infrastructure,
telecommunications and energy-driven initiative to tie Eurasia to China.

The 2017 plan identifies as risks to CPEC “Pakistani
politics, such as competing parties, religion, tribes, terrorists, and Western
intervention” as well as security. The plan appears to question the vibrancy of
a system in which competition between parties and interest groups is the name
of the game.

It envisions a full system of monitoring and
surveillance to ensure law and order in Pakistani cities. The system would
involve deployment of explosive detectors and scanners to “cover major roads,
case-prone areas and crowded places…in urban areas to conduct real-time
monitoring and 24-hour video recording.”

A national fibre optic backbone would be built for
internet traffic as well as the terrestrial distribution of broadcast media
that would cooperate with their Chinese counterparts in the “dissemination of
Chinese culture.” The plan described the backbone as a “cultural transmission
carrier” that would serve to “further enhance mutual understanding between the
two peoples and the traditional friendship between the two countries.”

Critics in China and elsewhere assert that repression of freedom of expression
contributed to China’s delayed response to the Coronavirus.
China rejects the criticism with President Xi Jingping
calling for even greater control.

Pakistan’s newly promulgated regulations echo Mr. Xi’s
assertion during the Communist party’s January 7 Politburo Standing Committee
meeting  that “we must strengthen public
opinion tracking and judgment, take the initiative to voice, provide positive
guidance, strengthen integration, communication and interaction, so that
positive energy will always fill the Internet space… We must control the overall public
opinion
and strive to create a good
public opinion environment. It is necessary to strengthen the management and
control of online media.”

#pakistan

Related Intelligence

More articles
Chokepoint Logic: Why Hormuz Remains the World’s Only True Thermostat
Middle East

Chokepoint Logic: Why Hormuz Remains the World’s Only True Thermostat

Despite the rise of American shale and the green energy transition, the Strait of Hormuz remains the single most critical vulnerability in the global economy. Power here is measured in barrels and leverage, not just navies.

15 May 2026

The Levantine Void: Lebanon’s Final Descent into State Dissolution
Middle East

The Levantine Void: Lebanon’s Final Descent into State Dissolution

Lebanon is no longer a state in crisis; it is a geographic theatre where the concept of the nation has been replaced by a fragmented security patchwork. Here is the structural reality of why the old Lebanon cannot return.

1 May 2026

The Yemen Mirror: Why Gulf Billions Failed to Buy Security
Middle East

The Yemen Mirror: Why Gulf Billions Failed to Buy Security

A decade of conflict has revealed a stark gap between military expenditure and strategic influence. As Riyadh pivots to diplomacy, the lessons of the Yemeni quagmire are reshaping the architecture of Middle Eastern power.

15 Apr 2026

Stateless Sovereignty: Why the Kurdish Dream is Now a Buffer Weapon
Middle East

Stateless Sovereignty: Why the Kurdish Dream is Now a Buffer Weapon

As regional powers in the Middle East fragment, the Kurdish 'non-state' has evolved from a historical tragedy into a permanent geopolitical buffer. While formal independence remains a mirage, the Kurds have become the indispensable veto players in the Levant.

1 Apr 2026

The Ghost of Radcliffe: Why 1947 Still Governs 21st-Century Asia
History

The Ghost of Radcliffe: Why 1947 Still Governs 21st-Century Asia

Geographic partitions are not historical events; they are active geopolitical engines. In South Asia, a hasty retirement from Empire created a structural instability that ensures permanent mobilisation and restricts the rise of two nuclear powers.

15 Mar 2026

The Leviathan's Edge: Why America Still Monopolises the Future
United States

The Leviathan's Edge: Why America Still Monopolises the Future

While critics forecast a hollowed-out empire, the United States has widened its lead in the global technology race. The reason is not policy, but a unique synthesis of capital risk, institutional elasticity, and geographic isolation.

1 Mar 2026