KJ ReportsKJ Reports

Why are tensions rising between Turkey and Iran?

Hazem Zahab14 December 2020650

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

Why are tensions rising between Turkey and Iran?

Turkey and Iran’s growing relationship

Turkey and Iran have already been having their interests aligning for the past several years. The nations’ opposition to American and Israeli dominance in the Middle East have been a major common ground. Furthermore, Turkey’s increasing cooperation with Russia has increased the possibilities of getting closer to Russian ally Iran. Turkey faces the UAE in Libya while Iran faces the UAE in Yemen through its Houthi proxy.

Historically, the Iranian-Turkish relationship has been one of competition, however, over time that has transformed into mutual respect and cooperation. After the Iranian revolution in 1979, relations became worse, as they turned into a regional rivalry between two different state ideologies – the religious revolutionary state of Iran versus the secular Republic of Turkey. However, the implementation of Turkish Foreign Policy has visibly changed with the arrival of the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) to power in 2002. After years of isolating itself from the East, Turkey commenced its “active engagement” policy, by re-establishing its ties with the countries in the Middle East and Central Asia. As a result of this shifting axis in Turkish Foreign Policy, the economic and political relations with Iran visibly improved. The two nations have since increased trade and worked together on geopolitical issues like dealing with the Kurds.

Since last year, we have seen the increasing possibility of a new alliance forming between Iran, Turkey and Russia, as all 3 have a common goal of reducing the US’s sphere of influence, as well as the more visible aim of containing the Kurds in Syria.

Two months ago, a video conference meeting between top Turkish and Iranian officials was held in a sign of willingness from both sides to increase cooperation. The meeting of Iran-Turkey High-Level Cooperation Council was held with the participation of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his Iranian counterpart Hasan Rouhani via videoconference.

“Unfortunately, we had to hold this meeting through video conferencing due to the pandemic. Despite this, it is an important message that we have shown the will to hold our meeting,” Erdoğan said.

Dialogue between Turkey and Iran has a decisive role in solving many local problems, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said, speaking ahead of the regular high-level cooperation meeting between the two neighboring countries. “Turkey and Iran dialogue has a decisive role in the solution of many regional problems. I believe that our cooperation will return to its previous levels as the pandemic conditions alleviate,” Erdoğan said at the beginning of the meeting.

What has led to a sudden rise in tensions

In recent days, tensions have risen rapidly between Turkey and Iran. What sparked this rise was the controversial poem that was recited by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan during his visit to Azerbaijan.

On Thursday, Erdogan paid a visit to staunch ally Azerbaijan for a military parade marking Baku’s victory over Armenia after six weeks of fighting over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region. During his visit, Erdogan recited a poem that Tehran said could fan separatism among Iran’s Azeri minority.

“They didn’t tell Erdogan that the poem he ill-recited in Baku refers to the forcible separation of areas north of Aras from the Iranian motherland,” Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif tweeted.

In the meantime, Iran’s Foreign Ministry said on its website on Friday: “The Turkish ambassador was informed that the era of territorial claims and expansionist empires is over.”

Iranian lawmaker Ali Asgar Hani threatened the Turkish president by posting a picture of Saddam Hussein hanging on Twitter with the caption: “Mr Erdogan, this was the fate of the last person who coveted Iranian land.” The image was later deleted.

Turkey on Saturday rebuked Tehran for “offensive language” aimed at President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in connection with a controversial poem that might suggest Iran’s northwestern provinces belong to Azerbaijan. It must be said that althoughIran and Turkey have increased economic cooperation over the past decade, they remain rivals in several parts of the Middle East and Central Asia.

Iranian authorities summoned Turkey’s ambassador to Tehran to complain about Erdogan’s “interventionist and unacceptable remarks.” In return, Turkey summoned Iran’s ambassador to Ankara over the “baseless” claims. Turkey doubled down on Saturday, with a statement by presidential communications director Fahrettin Altun that said: “We condemn the use of offensive language toward our president and our country over the recitation of a poem, whose meaning has been deliberately taken out of context.” Altun said the poem “passionately reflects the emotional experience of an aggrieved people due to Armenia’s occupation of Azerbaijani lands.”

Fakhrizadeh killing and other factors have made Tehran tense

This rise in tensions can be explained by an increasing sense of frustration in Tehran due to the detrimental events in recent weeks.

Two weeks ago, the Iranian nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh was assassinated Friday east of Tehran was shot by a remote-controlled machine gun operating out of another car, the semi-official Fars News Agency. He was the head of the research centre of new technology in the elite Revolutionary Guards and was a leading figure in Iran’s nuclear program. Fakhrizadeh was head of the research center of new technology in the elite Revolutionary Guards, and was a leading figure in Iran’s nuclear program for many years.

Israel was blamed for the attack, as Iran’s English-language Press TV reported on Monday that the weapon used in the killing of prominent Iranian nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh last week was made in Israel, the Islamic Republic’s longtime enemy. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif called on the international community “to end their shameful double standards” and “condemn this act of state terror.” He added that the attack showed “serious indications of Israeli role.” Maj. Gen. Hossein Dehghan, Khamenei’s military adviser, tweeted that “Zionists” are seeking to create “all-out war” and vowed to “descend like lightning” on Fakhrizadeh’s killers.

Howver, Iran have failed to respond to Israel’s direct attack on their nuclear program, most probably because Israel have taken the necessary measures in preparation for a reaction. This has certainly increased frustrations within the Iranian government, as they promised revenge to their people.

Another source of frustration that is more directly linked to Turkey, is Turkey and Azerbaijan’s success against Armenia and specifically Turkey ‘s increased influence in Azerbaijan as a result, an opportunity Iran could have taken but did not, and as a result Turkey’s sphere of influence has drastically increased, and is knocking on Iran’s door. Iran could very well feel threatened by this geopolitical expansion.

Furthermore, Iran fears an Azeri awakening within Iran as a result of Azerbaijan’s sweeping victory. There is a sizeable Azeri population in Iran, and many have supported Azerbaijan’s territorial war with Armenia.

Another factor that could have contributed to Iran’s hostility towards Ankara could be Turkey’s recent reapproachment with Saudi Arabia, who is Iran’s main geopolitical rival in the Middle East along with Israel.

Hence, Erdogan’s poem, which touched this sensitive issue and gave even more confidence to Azeris wanting to reunite Iranian Azeri lands with Azerbaijan, simply sparked a blast from a fire that was already simmering, and Tehran’s strong reaction is therefore expected.

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Mexican Pivot: Nearshoring, Cartels, and the New North America
United States

The Mexican Pivot: Nearshoring, Cartels, and the New North America

As supply chains decouple from China, Mexico is leveraging its industrial surge to redefine its relationship with Washington. But the fusion of economic growth and cartel state-building creates a complex new challenge for American continental hegemony.

12 Oct 2026

The Brazilian Bridge: The Limits of Non-Alignment
Geopolitics

The Brazilian Bridge: The Limits of Non-Alignment

President Lula da Silva’s quest for Global South leadership faces a structural impasse. Brazil must now decide if Chinese infrastructure capital is worth the cost of deteriorating security ties with a protective Washington.

12 Oct 2026

The Silicon Fulcrum: Taiwan’s Internal Fracture and the Island Chain
China

The Silicon Fulcrum: Taiwan’s Internal Fracture and the Island Chain

While the world watches the Taiwan Strait for warships, the real threat to the First Island Chain is domestic. Taipei’s widening political paralysis is eroding the structural foundations of the Pacific status quo.

10 Oct 2026

The Indonesian Pivot: Ending Western Maritime Hegemony
Geopolitics

The Indonesian Pivot: Ending Western Maritime Hegemony

Jakarta’s integration into the BRICS framework marks the definitive transition of Southeast Asia from a US-aligned maritime buffer to an independent multipolar anchor, fundamentally altering the logistics of Indo-Pacific power.

8 Oct 2026

The Addis Abyssal: Ethiopia’s Red Sea Strategy and the Cost of Access
History

The Addis Abyssal: Ethiopia’s Red Sea Strategy and the Cost of Access

Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s pursuit of a permanent naval presence on the Red Sea has fractured the Horn of Africa. This report examines the structural drivers of Ethiopia’s maritime ambition and the risk of systemic regional conflict.

7 Oct 2026

The Warsaw Ascendance: Poland and the End of the Franco-German Axis
Russia

The Warsaw Ascendance: Poland and the End of the Franco-German Axis

Poland’s massive rearmament and shift to an Atlanticist security model is breaking the EU’s traditional power balance. Warsaw is no longer a junior partner, but the new strategic centre of gravity in Europe.

7 Oct 2026