KJ ReportsKJ Reports

UK and US: The myth of the special relationship

13 July 20181,872

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

UK and US: The myth of the special relationship

▶ Check out my gear on Kit: https://kit.com/kjvids

The wreckage of WW2 left Britain effectively bankrupt and militarily overextended, whilst America emerged as the new superpower.

In order to stay relevant in global politics, Britain considered it essential to continue Churchill’s wartime alliance with the US.

In order to stay relevant in global politics, Britain considered it essential to continue Churchill’s wartime alliance with the US.

Britain allowed America to establish bases for B-29 bombers initiating foreign military bases on British soil.

The Secretary of State, Ernest Bevin, acknowledged the gravity of this decision and said “Permanent peacetime bases involved quite new principles.”

By 1950, the Americans were basing bombers carrying nuclear weapons in Britain as well as established NATO.

Even though WW2 ended, Britain took an unprecedented decision to continue conscription into peacetime.

Britain paid a “blood price” to show their commitment to US foreign policy and to project itself as a global power like the US.

This came at the peak of the Korean War when the Communist North invaded the South in June 1950.

British chiefs were opposed to sending troops to Korea to avoid harming relationswith Mao Zedong’s Communist China.

British chiefs were opposed to sending troops to Korea to avoid harming relationswith Mao Zedong’s Communist China.

“Refusal to provide troops would harm Anglo-American relations.” The cabinet decided that “British land forces should be sent in order to consolidate Anglo-American friendship and to placate American public opinion.”

In 1956, Britain’s futile attempt in invading Egypt in alliance with France and Israel was cut short by American political pressure.

Yet the British remained fully committed to maintaining an alliance with the USAregardless of the post-war humiliation.

Similarly, besides the strong opinion against America’s Vietnam war, Britain supplied military hardware and troops.

There are countless more examples in recent history that show that the “special” relationship only benefits one side.

Don’t forget to subscribe to our YouTube Channel

Support our content by donating to fundmypage.com/kjvids

Website – www.kjvids.co.uk
Facebook – www.facebook.com/KJVids
Twitter – www.twitter.com/kjvids2016
Instagram – www.instagram.com/kjvidsofficial

All Rights Reserved. Contact info@kjvids.co.uk if you are interested in licensing our content, advertising or working with us in other ways.

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Hegemon’s Fatigue: The End of US Forward Presence
United States

The Hegemon’s Fatigue: The End of US Forward Presence

Internal legislative paralysis and the erosion of executive war powers signal a structural shift in American grand strategy. Washington is no longer withdrawing by choice, but by domestic necessity, ending the era of global forward presence.

28 Jul 2026

The Infrastructure Ultimatum: Resetting Deterrence via Civilian Pain
United States

The Infrastructure Ultimatum: Resetting Deterrence via Civilian Pain

Washington has abandoned the pursuit of surgical military strikes in favour of targeting the dual-use infrastructure that keeps modern societies functioning. The shift signals a desperate attempt to regain leverage over Tehran without starting a ground war.

26 Jul 2026

The Attrition Doctrine: Why Washington Abandoned Managed Escalation
United States

The Attrition Doctrine: Why Washington Abandoned Managed Escalation

Under the second Trump administration, the United States has pivoted from cautious proxy support to the systematic destruction of adversary infrastructure. This shift marks the definitive end of the post-Cold War era of calibrated conflict management.

25 Jul 2026

The Sudano-Sahelian Vacuum: A New Continental Struggle for Power
History

The Sudano-Sahelian Vacuum: A New Continental Struggle for Power

The collapse of the Sudanese state has created a geopolitical void that is forcing a radical rearmament across the Sahel. This is no longer local civil war; it is a structural race for African resource sovereignty.

16 Jul 2026

The Ankara Schism: NATO as a Transactional Clearinghouse
History

The Ankara Schism: NATO as a Transactional Clearinghouse

Turkey is no longer a peripheral partner but a central disruptor. By prioritising regional sovereignty over collective security, Ankara has transformed NATO from a mutual defence union into a marketplace for national interests.

13 Jul 2026

The Islamabad Memorandum: Ending the Age of American Interventionalism
United States

The Islamabad Memorandum: Ending the Age of American Interventionalism

The landmark agreement in Pakistan signals a definitive shift in US grand strategy. By trading military dominance for regional pacification, Washington has acknowledged that its internal populist pressures now outweigh its external imperial ambitions.

1 Jul 2026