KJ ReportsKJ Reports

UK and US: The myth of the special relationship

13 July 20181,868

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

UK and US: The myth of the special relationship

▶ Check out my gear on Kit: https://kit.com/kjvids

The wreckage of WW2 left Britain effectively bankrupt and militarily overextended, whilst America emerged as the new superpower.

In order to stay relevant in global politics, Britain considered it essential to continue Churchill’s wartime alliance with the US.

In order to stay relevant in global politics, Britain considered it essential to continue Churchill’s wartime alliance with the US.

Britain allowed America to establish bases for B-29 bombers initiating foreign military bases on British soil.

The Secretary of State, Ernest Bevin, acknowledged the gravity of this decision and said “Permanent peacetime bases involved quite new principles.”

By 1950, the Americans were basing bombers carrying nuclear weapons in Britain as well as established NATO.

Even though WW2 ended, Britain took an unprecedented decision to continue conscription into peacetime.

Britain paid a “blood price” to show their commitment to US foreign policy and to project itself as a global power like the US.

This came at the peak of the Korean War when the Communist North invaded the South in June 1950.

British chiefs were opposed to sending troops to Korea to avoid harming relationswith Mao Zedong’s Communist China.

British chiefs were opposed to sending troops to Korea to avoid harming relationswith Mao Zedong’s Communist China.

“Refusal to provide troops would harm Anglo-American relations.” The cabinet decided that “British land forces should be sent in order to consolidate Anglo-American friendship and to placate American public opinion.”

In 1956, Britain’s futile attempt in invading Egypt in alliance with France and Israel was cut short by American political pressure.

Yet the British remained fully committed to maintaining an alliance with the USAregardless of the post-war humiliation.

Similarly, besides the strong opinion against America’s Vietnam war, Britain supplied military hardware and troops.

There are countless more examples in recent history that show that the “special” relationship only benefits one side.

Don’t forget to subscribe to our YouTube Channel

Support our content by donating to fundmypage.com/kjvids

Website – www.kjvids.co.uk
Facebook – www.facebook.com/KJVids
Twitter – www.twitter.com/kjvids2016
Instagram – www.instagram.com/kjvidsofficial

All Rights Reserved. Contact info@kjvids.co.uk if you are interested in licensing our content, advertising or working with us in other ways.

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Islamabad Memorandum: Ending the Age of American Interventionalism
United States

The Islamabad Memorandum: Ending the Age of American Interventionalism

The landmark agreement in Pakistan signals a definitive shift in US grand strategy. By trading military dominance for regional pacification, Washington has acknowledged that its internal populist pressures now outweigh its external imperial ambitions.

1 Jul 2026

The Populist Ceiling: The End of American Hegemony in the Persian Gulf
United States

The Populist Ceiling: The End of American Hegemony in the Persian Gulf

Domestic electoral fatigue is forcing Washington to abandon its role as the Gulf's maritime guarantor. As populist incentives override strategic doctrine, a terminal de-escalation is reshaping the global energy order.

30 Jun 2026

The Atlantic Schism: Europe’s Industrial Logic Defeats NATO Unity
United States

The Atlantic Schism: Europe’s Industrial Logic Defeats NATO Unity

As American protectionism and high energy costs hollow out the European heartland, the Continent is quietly decoupling from Washington's security architecture to preserve its industrial base through pragmatic deals with the East.

29 Jun 2026

The Frontier Retraction: Why US Hegemony is Defaulting on its Debt
United States

The Frontier Retraction: Why US Hegemony is Defaulting on its Debt

America is not collapsing, but it is contracting. A volatile mix of domestic fiscal exhaustion and the rising costs of global maintenance is forcing Washington to abandon its role as the world's primary security guarantor.

27 Jun 2026

The APRA Mandate: Australia’s Financial Hedging for a Post-US Order
United States

The APRA Mandate: Australia’s Financial Hedging for a Post-US Order

As Canberra adjusts its regulatory framework to account for intensifying geopolitical shocks, a deeper shift is occurring: Australia is decoupling its financial stability from the total reliance on the American security umbrella.

19 Jun 2026

The Security Deficit: Why Washington is Resigning as Global Underwriter
United States

The Security Deficit: Why Washington is Resigning as Global Underwriter

As domestic debt surges and populist sentiment hardens, the United States is quietly retracting its global security umbrella. This strategic withdrawal is forcing allies toward a messy, fragmented era of self-reliance.

16 Jun 2026