KJ ReportsKJ Reports

The Geopolitics of Myanmar

3 September 20171,568

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

The Geopolitics of Myanmar

Since ancient times, the land known today as Myanmar has been famous for its wealth in natural resources of all kinds.

The Sanskrit name Suvarnabhumi, meaning “Golden Land,” has been associated with Myanmar for over two millennia.

Myanmar is geologically very rich, and mining is significant as a large-scale industry

Mineral occurrences cover all sectors, including base metals (gold, copper, silver, lead, zinc, tin, antimony, iron, etc.), industrial minerals, energy sources (mainly coal), gems (jade, rubies, sapphires, etc.), as well as “rare earth” minerals.

Myanmar is perhaps best known for gold, jade, rubies, and sapphires. It is estimated that in the past, 90 percent of the world’s rubies came from Myanmar.

Myanmar is also one of the world’s oldest oil producers, having first exported its first barrel in 1853 while under British colonial rule.

Myanmar’s energy ministry lists proven crude oil reserve estimates of $3.2 billion barrels and gas reserves of 11.8 trillion cubic feet (placing it about eight in the world)

With its untapped natural resources, large potential of its nascent markets and strategic geographic location connecting South and Southeast Asia (and mainland China), Myanmar is a geopolitical asset.

Aside from its economic value, Myanmar’s strategic location serves as an important link for China’s market expansion in South and Southeast Asia.

A critical lifeline for China is access to maritime routes. The main and historic ports of China sit along the South and East China seas and are problematic due to their exposure to the Malacca Strait choke point.

China can overcome this constraint in multiple ways, including bypassing it altogether with direct land access to the Indian Ocean.

China’s approach to securing this overland access to the Indian Ocean is through Myanmar.

But to achieve this goal, China must have influence over, or be on good terms with, Myanmar’s government.

U.S.-Burmese ties had been on a downward trajectory since the military coup in 1988. The U.S. responded by imposing sanctions, banning imports

During this period of disengagement from the ruling junta, neighboring China was moving in and gaining influence.

China became a leading trade partner of Myanmar and developed extensive diplomatic, commercial, and military ties.

China gained access to Burmese ports in the Bay of Bengal, which provided it with the ability to project power and establish a military foothold in the region

It also assisted in the development of a port at Kyaukpyu. This is significant, as the Chinese are developing an oil and natural gas pipeline directly to China

This pipeline would enable China to import oil from the Middle East while bypassing the Straits of Malacca

The advancement of U.S.-Burmese relations will have profound strategic implications for China as it nervously watches the U.S. moves in the region.

The competition over Myanmar is also core reason why both America and China have ignored the ethnic cleansing of Rohingya Muslims in Burma.

As the geopolitical competition between America and China intensify, Myanmar, will increasingly make the news and the region is likely to have profound implications in the future.

The Chinese have feared that the U.S. would block Chinese oil imports in a crisis by closing the straits, and this pipeline would safeguard against this.

But the US recently began a process of normalizing ties with Myanmar following a long period of estrangement

In November 2012, Obama became the first American President to visit Myanmar. This was within a year after Hillary Clinton announced America’s “Pivot to Asia”

The Pivot to Asia  features the U.S. focusing additional military and diplomatic resources on the region to counter a rising China

As the U.S. and Myanmar develop closer relations, these Chinese inroads into Myanmar are under threat, and the potential strategic losses for China are serious.

The advancement of U.S.-Burmese relations will have profound strategic implications for China as it nervously watches the U.S. moves in the region.

The competition over Myanmar is also core reason why both America and China have ignored the ethnic cleansing of Rohingya Muslims in Burma.

As the geopolitical competition between America and China intensify, Myanmar, will increasingly make the news and the region is likely to have profound implications in the future.

#america-burma#bangladesh-rohingya#bangladesh-rohingya-camp#bangladesh-rohingya-news#bay-of-begal#burma#burma-geopolitics#burma-rohingya#burma-rohingya-crisis#burma-rohingya-genocide#burma-rohingya-muslim-video#burma-rohingya-muslims-history#burmese-muslims#china-burma#muslims-in-rohingya#myanmar#myanmar-geopolitics#myanmar-politics#rohingya#rohingya-genocide#rohingya-history#rohingya-migrants#rohingya-migration#rohingya-musims#rohingya-muslim-crisis#rohingya-muslims#rohingya-muslims-in-burma#rohingya-pronounce#strait-of-malacca#us-burma

Related Intelligence

More articles
The Kinshasa-Beijing Axis: Why the West Cannot Break the Cobalt Grip
Geopolitics

The Kinshasa-Beijing Axis: Why the West Cannot Break the Cobalt Grip

Western attempts to bypass the Democratic Republic of Congo in the electric vehicle supply chain have failed. As Kinshasa tightens its pact with Beijing, the global energy transition now rests on a single, fragile geopolitical chokepoint.

14 Oct 2026

The Seoul Divergence: South Korea’s Path to Independent Deterrence
Geopolitics

The Seoul Divergence: South Korea’s Path to Independent Deterrence

South Korea is moving toward a domestic nuclear capability, threatening the foundations of the US-led alliance system. This shift represents a structural loss of faith in American security guarantees in a multipolar Asia.

13 Oct 2026

The Brazilian Bridge: The Limits of Non-Alignment
Geopolitics

The Brazilian Bridge: The Limits of Non-Alignment

President Lula da Silva’s quest for Global South leadership faces a structural impasse. Brazil must now decide if Chinese infrastructure capital is worth the cost of deteriorating security ties with a protective Washington.

12 Oct 2026

The Indonesian Pivot: Ending Western Maritime Hegemony
Geopolitics

The Indonesian Pivot: Ending Western Maritime Hegemony

Jakarta’s integration into the BRICS framework marks the definitive transition of Southeast Asia from a US-aligned maritime buffer to an independent multipolar anchor, fundamentally altering the logistics of Indo-Pacific power.

8 Oct 2026

The Arctic Paradox: Why NATO’s High North Expansion Thinning Europe
Geopolitics

The Arctic Paradox: Why NATO’s High North Expansion Thinning Europe

NATO’s northern enlargement has created a new frontline that stretches Western logistics and obscures strategic depth. By trying to secure the Arctic, the alliance risks hollowing out the core European theatre it was designed to protect.

6 Oct 2026

The Tokyo Tightening: Japan’s Pivot and the End of Global Subsidies
Geopolitics

The Tokyo Tightening: Japan’s Pivot and the End of Global Subsidies

Japan's departure from zero-interest rates is not merely a domestic adjustment. It is a structural shock that removes the floor from Western debt markets, forcing a painful re-pricing of global risk.

26 Sept 2026