KJ ReportsKJ Reports

Are the breakdown of talks between the US and Taliban a positive sign for Afghanistan?

Hazem Zahab11 September 2019839

Listen to this article

KJ narrates this report in his own voice

Are the breakdown of talks between the US and Taliban a positive sign for Afghanistan?

Taliban continues violence as the US ends talks

In recent weeks, the Taliban appeared to have found a deal with the US regarding the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, as Zalmay Khalilzad, the American envoy who had been leading the talks since they began late last year, tweeted that they had made “excellent progress.” Despite this, the Taliban kept up a near-daily rate of deadly attacks, despite holding several rounds of peace talks with Khalilzad since his appointment almost a year ago.  The US has appeared to finally understand the Taliban’s tactics, and have withdrawn from talks completely. In a statement to Al Jazeera, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said Washington would regret turning its back on talks spearheaded by high-level officials from both sides. “We had two ways to end the occupation in Afghanistan, one was jihad and fighting, the other was talks and negotiations,” Mujahid said. On Monday, Trump told reporters: “They’re dead. They’re dead,” referring to negotiations with the armed group, adding that he was still thinking about troop withdrawal in the country. However, it seems the US has come to the realization that withdrawing its troops, would not end the war but only increase the influence of the Taliban in the region, which is one of the reasons the Taliban were keen on negotiations. 

Afghanistan officials happy talks have ended:

During US negotiations with the Taliban, the Afghan government was excluded from talks, and it appeared like the US had sacrificed the safety of Afghanistan in favour of their goal to withdraw troops. This has however changed with the US’s recent abrupt end to talks, which the Afghan government takes as a positive sign. For many Afghans, the abrupt suspension of talks after 10 months of negotiations was not entirely unexpected. What jarred them was the notion that a single attack, and the death of one American, could really have upended the talks when the deaths of thousands of Afghans this year. There had been deep scepticism in Afghanistan that the Taliban would ever agree to share power, cut ties with terrorist groups or stop killing civilians — especially after the group ramped up suicide attacks in urban centres during the talks. Many Afghans also have expressed concern that the United States, eager to end nearly 18 years of war in Afghanistan, would withdraw its 14,000 troops abruptly. Some fear such a move would precipitate the kind of mayhem that nearly destroyed the country and brought the Taliban to power in 1996. However, it now appears the US has taken a step back and re-considered the situation. 

Are the US responsible for the collapse of talks?

While reactions in Afghanistan are positive, in the US there are serious doubts, and the blame is being put on the US government for the falling apart of talks. Laurel Miller, who was President Obama’s special representative in Afghanistan and Pakistan had this to say when asked about who was responsible for the failed talks: “I think the United States. I mean, I  that’s not to say that there haven’t been difficulties in the negotiations or that the Taliban hasn’t been stubbornly insistent on its positions. But there’s no evidence so far there was any last-minute change of position their part. There’s only evidence that there was this last-minute initiative to hold the Camp David meeting,” adding that she believes re-starting talks is inevitable, despite Trump’s statements, saying, “there’s no good alternative to trying to negotiate a peace agreement in Afghanistan. That remains true today as it was a few days before this. It’s obviously going to be hard to restart the talks if the parties want to because credibility has been damaged. And, already, minimal trust has been a further loss.” It remains to be seen whether this will be fulfilled as the US finds itself in a complex position.

#afghanistan#taliban#united-states

Related Intelligence

More articles
The APRA Mandate: Australia’s Financial Hedging for a Post-US Order
United States

The APRA Mandate: Australia’s Financial Hedging for a Post-US Order

As Canberra adjusts its regulatory framework to account for intensifying geopolitical shocks, a deeper shift is occurring: Australia is decoupling its financial stability from the total reliance on the American security umbrella.

19 Jun 2026

The Security Deficit: Why Washington is Resigning as Global Underwriter
United States

The Security Deficit: Why Washington is Resigning as Global Underwriter

As domestic debt surges and populist sentiment hardens, the United States is quietly retracting its global security umbrella. This strategic withdrawal is forcing allies toward a messy, fragmented era of self-reliance.

16 Jun 2026

The Sovereign Sanctuary: America’s Retreat to Fortress North America
United States

The Sovereign Sanctuary: America’s Retreat to Fortress North America

As the 2026 World Cup begins, the United States is quietly pivoting from global ideologue to insular hegemon. By prioritising domestic stability over democratic export, Washington is redrawing the map of American power.

15 Jun 2026

The Leviathan's Edge: Why America Still Monopolises the Future
United States

The Leviathan's Edge: Why America Still Monopolises the Future

While critics forecast a hollowed-out empire, the United States has widened its lead in the global technology race. The reason is not policy, but a unique synthesis of capital risk, institutional elasticity, and geographic isolation.

1 Mar 2026

Debt, Dominance, and the Weaponisation of the Dollar
United States

Debt, Dominance, and the Weaponisation of the Dollar

The United States faces a mounting fiscal crisis, but the real threat to the dollar's hegemony is not solvency—it is the erosion of the trust required to underpin the world's primary neutral settlement tool.

1 Jan 2026

The Fractional Guard: Why the Petrodollar Survives by Shrinking
United States

The Fractional Guard: Why the Petrodollar Survives by Shrinking

While headlines predict the dollar’s total demise, the true shift is far more subtle. We are entering a period of strategic fragmentation where the US dollar trades its monopoly for a more durable, albeit smaller, sphere of influence.

1 Sept 2025